W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org > July to September 2015

RE: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch

From: Greg Eck <greck@postone.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 13:32:09 +0000
To: "jrmt@almas.co.jp" <jrmt@almas.co.jp>, "public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org" <public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BN3PR10MB03217D3850F31FE7EF020EF7AF730@BN3PR10MB0321.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
Specifically we are talking about 6 FVS assignments that are problematic as detailed in my document put out last week entitled FVS MisMatch.docx sent on August 2, 2015.


1.)    Deprecate <U+1820-Medial><U+180C> and substitute <U+1820-Initial><U+180B>.

2.)    Deprecate <U+1828-Medial><U+180C> and substitute <U+1828-Final><U+180B>.

3.)    Deprecate <U+182C-Medial><U+180C> and substitute <U+182C-Final><U+180B>.

4.)    Deprecate <U+182C-Medial><U+180D> and substitute <U+182C-Final>.

5.)    Deprecate <U+182D-Medial><U+180C> and substitute <U+182D-Final><U+180D>.

6.)    Deprecate <U+1835-Medial><U+180B> and substitute <U+1835-Final><U+180B>.

7.)    Deprecate <U+1836-Medial><U+180C> and substitute <U+1836-Final>.

Greg

From: jrmt@almas.co.jp [mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp]
Sent: Friday, August 7, 2015 6:51 AM
To: Greg Eck <greck@postone.net>; public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
Subject: RE: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch

Hi Greg,

Do you mean "we discuss the 6 variant FVS assignments first" is mean, we discuss these 6 FVS assignment firstly ?
U1820-A
U1828-NA
U182C-QA
U182D-GA
U1835-JA
U1836-YA

Ok, Let us discuss these first. Can I write them all in separate thread ?
Let me input our team's comment on these 6 FVS assignment one by one after I go to office today.

Thanks and Regards,

Jirimutu
==========================================================
Almas Inc.
101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo
E-Mail: jrmt@almas.co.jp<mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp>   Mobile : 090-6174-6115
Phone : 03-5688-2081,   Fax : 03-5688-2082
http://www.almas.co.jp/   http://www.compiere-japan.com/
==========================================================




From: Greg Eck [mailto:greck@postone.net]
Sent: Friday, August 7, 2015 2:17 AM
To: jrmt@almas.co.jp<mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp>; public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org<mailto:public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
Subject: FW: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch

Hi Jirimutu,

If we limit our comments to just the 6 FVS assignments, this is what I see ...


*         You are in agreement with my suggestions for the suggestions being put before the UTC as outlined in my reponse to Erdenchimeg.

*         As to the new variant at U+1820/U+1821-Final swept left with no space - would it be something like the attached? This is the sequence < U+180A >< U+180A ><U+1820> with no MVS included. Would this not do?

*         You have further discussion on U+182D - let's wait until we find resolution on the 6 variant FVS assignments first.

*         You have further discussion on U+136 - let's wait until we find resolution on the 6 variant FVS assignments first.

Greg



From: jrmt@almas.co.jp<mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> [mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp]
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 7:01 AM
To: Greg Eck <greck@postone.net<mailto:greck@postone.net>>; public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org<mailto:public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
Subject: RE: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch

Hi Greg,

I have some inputs in the FVS assignment MisMatch documents.

Thanks and Regards,


Jirimutu
==========================================================
Almas Inc.
101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo
E-Mail: jrmt@almas.co.jp<mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp>   Mobile : 090-6174-6115
Phone : 03-5688-2081,   Fax : 03-5688-2082
http://www.almas.co.jp/   http://www.compiere-japan.com/
==========================================================



From: Greg Eck [mailto:greck@postone.net]
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 12:14 AM
To: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org<mailto:public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
Subject: New Thread - FVS Assignment MisMatch

We are winding down on the NNBSP discussion.

Let's go ahead with another topic as attached dealing with 6 FVS assignments. The basic issue is that the current specification says to make the assignment at one position whereas the glyph is processed by OT rulings at another position.

Greg
Received on Friday, 7 August 2015 13:33:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:07:05 UTC