W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org > July to September 2015

RE: U+1885-Baluda and U+1886-TripleBaluda

From: Greg Eck <greck@postone.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 16:12:48 +0000
To: Andrew West <andrewcwest@gmail.com>
CC: "public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org" <public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BN3PR10MB03217A1DA71BCDC965422CEFAF740@BN3PR10MB0321.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
Thanks Andrew.
I notice the 1880-Anusvara and the 1881 Visarga also.
Your library is a treasure trove I need to spend some time in again.

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew West [mailto:andrewcwest@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2015 11:58 PM
To: Greg Eck <greck@postone.net>
Cc: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
Subject: U+1885-Baluda and U+1886-TripleBaluda

On 1 August 2015 at 14:48, Greg Eck <greck@postone.net> wrote:
> I am attaching a file from some of professor Quejingzhabu's notes dealing with the U+1885-Baluda and the U+1886-TripleBaluda.
> The instruction from the professor is to attach the baluda glyphs to the right side (vertical) of the top of the word.
> The image is admittedly to be interpreted, but it is all that I have - I have never seen an original source image.
> I don't know of any font that has successfully implemented the baluda as the professor describes it's shaping behavior.
> As I see it, we implement either baluda as a diacritic on the right side of the stem just as the U+18A9-Dagalga is attached on the left.
> Comments are welcome.

Hi Greg,

There are some examples of Baluda and Triple Baluda usage here:


The contents for these pages are listed here:


Received on Thursday, 6 August 2015 16:13:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:07:04 UTC