- From: Michel Suignard <michel@suignard.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 06:43:32 +0000
- To: Richard Wordingham <richard.wordingham@ntlworld.com>, "public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org" <public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
I'll look into that. It is likely a production issue (I updated the font a while ago and it looks like a regression). It should be an easy fix. Like I said in another message, standardizedvariants.html is not maintained anymore. The differences between that file and the code charts are by design. The code chart use a production font (Mongolian Baiti) with some modification to allow to display all glyphs in a code chart. It does not mean that it is correct but at least it should be closer to a real implementation. Michel -----Original Message----- From: Richard Wordingham [mailto:richard.wordingham@ntlworld.com] Sent: Sunday, August 2, 2015 2:35 PM To: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org Subject: Mongolian Variation Sequences Missing from Unicode 8.00 Code Chart I have now reported the following error to Unicode: The glyphs for the following Mongolian variation sequences are missing from the Mongolian code chart for Version 8.00: 1820 180C (medial) 1828 180D (medial) 182C 180C (medial) 182C 180D (medial) 1835 180B (medial) 1836 180C (medial) I intend to report the errors attached below tomorrow (Monday) at some time after 17:00 UTC. Please advise if I should not. Richard. The glyph for 182C 180B (isolated) has a pair of dots in Standardised Variants but not in the code chart. I believe the dots are semantically significant. I suspect there is a problem with the overpainting order within the PDF. (I viewed the chart with Firefox on Ubuntu 12.04.) The glyphs for the following are strikingly different: 182D 180B (final) 182D 180C (medial) 1838 180B (final) 186F 180B (initial)
Received on Monday, 3 August 2015 06:44:02 UTC