- From: Greg Eck <greck@postone.net>
- Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2015 15:40:47 +0000
- To: Richard Wordingham <richard.wordingham@ntlworld.com>, "public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org" <public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 1 August 2015 15:41:37 UTC
I don't know of any spell-checkers for Mongolian in Word. Aaron, do you know of anything in the works for spell-checkers in Mongolian? Greg -----Original Message----- From: Richard Wordingham [mailto:richard.wordingham@ntlworld.com] Sent: Saturday, August 1, 2015 7:00 PM To: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org Subject: Re: Mongolian NNBSP [I18N-ACTION-458] On Sat, 1 Aug 2015 11:31:54 +0100 Andrew West <andrewcwest@gmail.com<mailto:andrewcwest@gmail.com>> wrote: > I thought that rendering engines were already correctly rendering > suffixes after NNBSP, and that the issue was with some editors and > word processors (notably Word) incorrectly segmenting Mongolian text > for word counting, word selection and word navigation purposes. If > text-processing applications rely on WordBreakProperty.txt for word > breaking then they should work after the change is introduced; if not, > then it is up to users to report the behaviour as a bug to the > individual software vendors. Word doesn't use WordBreakProperty.txt. While Microsoft may take note of a recommended change to the file, the trouble with NNBSP should be reported independently. The best argument would be what happens for spell-checking. Does Word have a Mongolian spell-checker? Richard.
Received on Saturday, 1 August 2015 15:41:37 UTC