RE: "This version" this "Latest version" links

• From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@translate.com>
• Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 08:43:04 +0100
• To: "'Felix Sasaki'" <fsasaki@w3.org>, <public-i18n-its@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <001601c85293$53beea30$6632a8c0@BREIZH>

Hi Felix, all,

> - Links to ITS 1.0 spec: I think we should use either "this version" 
> or "latest version". Currently we use both. My preference would be 
> "this version" links.
> - "Internationalization Best Practices: Handling Right-to-left Scripts 
> in XHTML and HTML Content": this is currently a WD, so using a
>  "latest version" link might be good since we want to direct people 
> to the to-be-published WG note (see the shortname i18n-html-tech-bidi).
> - Link to xml lang  and white space definition: I might be convinced 
> now that we can use a "latest version" link.
> - For the other links, i.e. to Ruby, "Unicode in XML", XHTML 1, xml:id 
> and XML Schema, I would prefer a "this version" link.

All sound fine (and for xml:lang I have no strong opinion either way).

-ys

Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2008 07:46:34 UTC