- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:15:05 +0900
- To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Hi all, (see ACTION-45 and ACTION-33) Richard and me discussed offline the "latest vs. this version links" topic. We came up with the result that we need to decide this for each link. Below is a list of links we have in the BP document. I have classified them as follows. - Links to ITS 1.0 spec: I think we should use either "this version" or "latest version". Currently we use both. My preference would be "this version" links. - "Internationalization Best Practices: Handling Right-to-left Scripts in XHTML and HTML Content": this is currently a WD, so using a "latest version" link might be good since we want to direct people to the to-be-published WG note (see the shortname i18n-html-tech-bidi). - Link to xml lang and white space definition: I might be convinced now that we can use a "latest version" link. - For the other links, i.e. to Ruby, "Unicode in XML", XHTML 1, xml:id and XML Schema, I would prefer a "this version" link. Looking forward for your feedback, Felix http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-its-20070403/#att.dir.attributes http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-its-20070403/#conformance-product-schema http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-its-20070403/#datacategories-defaults-etc http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-its-20070403/#def-selection http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-its-20070403/#ruby http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-its-20070403/#terminology http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-i18n-html-tech-bidi-20070606/#d2e283 http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#sec-lang-tag http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#sec-white-space http://www.w3.org/TR/i18n-html-tech-bidi/ http://www.w3.org/TR/i18n-html-tech-bidi/#ri20030728.094313871 http://www.w3.org/TR/i18n-html-tech-lang/#ri20050128.175100333 http://www.w3.org/TR/i18n-html-tech-lang/#ri20050208.095812479 http://www.w3.org/TR/its/ http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#att.dir http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#att.local.with-ns.attribute.locNote http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#att.local.with-ns.attribute.locNoteRef http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#att.local.with-ns.attribute.locNoteType http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#att.local.with-ns.attribute.term http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#att.local.with-ns.attribute.termInfoRef http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#att.translate http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#att.version http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#datacategories-defaults-etc http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#dirRule http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#directionality http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#elements-within-text http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#langRule http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#langRule.attributes http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#language-information http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#locNote http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#locNote-datacat http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#locNoteRule http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#locNoteRule.attributes http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#rb http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#rp http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#rt http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#ruby http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#ruby-annotation http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#rubyRule http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#rubyRule.attributes http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#rules http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#rules.attributes http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#selection-global http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#selection-local http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#selection-precedence http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#span http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#span.attributes http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#termRule http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#termRule.attributes http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#terminology http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#trans-datacat http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#translateRule http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#withinTextRule http://www.w3.org/TR/its/its.xsd http://www.w3.org/TR/ruby/ http://www.w3.org/TR/unicode-xml/ http://www.w3.org/TR/unicode-xml/#Bidi http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#well-formed http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-id/ http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/#ref23 http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/#ref31 http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/#ref52 http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#concepts-conformance
Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2008 05:15:22 UTC