RE: Accepting changes to BP doc - BP 22

Hi Richard,

Thanks for all of the edits.

Here are a couple of observations/remarks related to BP 22. Despite of them, I
would be alright with the edits you have done.

Cheers,
Christian
==

1. I would prefer to start the "Why do this" with the "If not used properly" 
rather than with types and implementations.

2. Revealing why types and implementations are mentioned might be helpful. 
>From my understanding, we mention the different types and implementations in 
order to allow authors to spot inserted text easily.

3. We could consider a note along the lines that for example "automated text" 
is used as a synonym in some contexts.

4. I wonder if the "However, such a construction has several problems: " with 
all of the bullets should go into the example 29 rather than living outside.

-----Original Message-----
From: public-i18n-its-request@w3.org [mailto:public-i18n-its-request@w3.org] 
On Behalf Of Richard Ishida
Sent: Montag, 3. Dezember 2007 15:52
To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Subject: Accepting changes to BP doc


Having heard from no-one except Yves, I assume that you are happy with the 
proposed changes currently highlighted in the ITS BP document. So to move 
things along, I hereby give notice that if I hear nothing more before then, 
tomorrow morning, UK time, I will accept all marked changes and all proposals 
in notes.

Cheers,
RI

============
Richard Ishida
Internationalization Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)

http://www.w3.org/International/
http://rishida.net/blog/
http://rishida.net/