- From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@translate.com>
- Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 07:01:20 -0600
- To: <public-i18n-its@w3.org>
Hi everyone, I had the action item: "Yves to try a restructering of existing examples and how to put highlights and find a pattern". Looking at the sections we currently have it seems that one of the pattern that would make sense is the following: - The title of the section - The short description of the guideline (in the blue rectangle) - A "How to do this" part where we describe how to implement the guideline, with examples if needed. - A "Why doing this" part where we give more details - An optional "Legacy data" part with details on how the BP applies to existing schemas/DTDs. - The resources part Maybe the "Legacy data" part should be after or part of the "How to do this" part since it is after all implementation-related rather than explanations. Or the "How to do this" part should be broken down into different options: the recommended one, then the fallbacks. I've changed some of the BPs to match that structure, see for example: - http://www.w3.org/International/its/techniques/its-techniques.html#DevLang - http://www.w3.org/International/its/techniques/its-techniques.html#AuthLang Cheers, -yves
Received on Sunday, 25 March 2007 13:01:22 UTC