- From: <azydron@xml-intl.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 02:32:57 +0200 (CEST)
- To: "Yves Savourel" <ysavourel@translate.com>
- Cc: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Hi Yves, I am at the CMS Strategies conference in Bostont this week and will not be able to take part in this week's TC. Please accept my apologies. Best Regards, AZ On Sun, March 25, 2007 3:01 pm, Yves Savourel wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > I had the action item: "Yves to try a restructering of existing examples > and how to put highlights and find a pattern". > > Looking at the sections we currently have it seems that one of the > pattern that would make sense is the following: > > - The title of the section > > > - The short description of the guideline (in the blue rectangle) > > > - A "How to do this" part where we describe how to implement the > guideline, with examples if needed. > > - A "Why doing this" part where we give more details > > > - An optional "Legacy data" part with details on how the BP applies to > existing schemas/DTDs. > > - The resources part > > > Maybe the "Legacy data" part should be after or part of the "How to do > this" part since it is after all implementation-related rather than > explanations. Or the "How to do this" part should be broken down into > different options: the recommended one, then the fallbacks. > > I've changed some of the BPs to match that structure, see for example: > > > - > http://www.w3.org/International/its/techniques/its-techniques.html#DevLan > g - > http://www.w3.org/International/its/techniques/its-techniques.html#AuthLa > ng > > > Cheers, > -yves > > > > >
Received on Monday, 26 March 2007 00:33:43 UTC