RE: Exploring the change from Ref to Uri

Very good points indeed.  

-----Original Message-----
From: public-i18n-its-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-i18n-its-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Yves Savourel
Sent: Dienstag, 25. Juli 2006 17:11
To: 'Felix Sasaki'
Cc: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Subject: RE: Exploring the change from Ref to Uri


> I'm not sure if the change really makes things clearer. Looking at
other 
> vocabularies which require an URI data type, I don't find one with the
> *name* "URI". For example, HTML has the href attribute, XLink as well,
...
>
> should we really name the attributes after their data type, or isn't 
> naming after their function the common way? I am not sure if the term 
> URI is common enough for that purpose.

Good points.

-ys

Received on Tuesday, 25 July 2006 15:24:00 UTC