- From: Sebastian Rahtz <Sebastian.Rahtz@oucs.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 14:33:10 +0100
- To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- CC: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Felix Sasaki wrote: > Of course we could drop the conformance part. The question is only: Do > we want to give people who create ITS+mySchema a means to check if they > have don the right job? I suppose I was thinking that people who want to do it right will use our schema fragments exactly as they come (and so that's the conformance); while people who will hack their stuff in hand won't care about conformance. You are positing a group in between who roll their own, but want a way to check they have done it right. The conformance section could say "you have to either use our schema fragments, or else what you write has to implement exactly the same constraints as those schema fragments". What I am getting to is that our schema fragments _will_ be normative in some sense. -- Sebastian Rahtz *Open Source and Sustainability* 10-12 April 2006, Oxford http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk/events/2006-04-10-12/ Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431 OSS Watch: JISC Open Source Advisory Service http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk
Received on Friday, 31 March 2006 13:33:25 UTC