- From: Yves Savourel <yves@opentag.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 20:15:46 -0700
- To: "'Sebastian Rahtz'" <Sebastian.Rahtz@oucs.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: <public-i18n-its@w3.org>
Thanks for the summary Sebastian. Now it's very clear to me. Yes, if we have mapping we need this extra precedence rule and I agree that it would make sense to have the ITS attribute or element to win. Cheers, -yves -----Original Message----- From: Sebastian Rahtz [mailto:Sebastian.Rahtz@oucs.ox.ac.uk] Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 4:16 PM To: Yves Savourel Cc: public-i18n-its@w3.org Subject: Proposal 07 This is very sinple. It says ************ proposal-07: add to the precedence rules a rule for "Selections inherited from other local usages of ITS markup" ************ If we support mapping of existing attributes to data categories, we have to decide what happens if an ITS attribute and a mapped attribute are both supplied. So if we did have a translate mapping, we may encounter: <p translate="yes" its:translate="no"> and we need to know which is which. I suggest that specific ITS attributes on an element have the highest precedence. So the example above would get the "no" value for translate. -- Sebastian Rahtz *Open Source and Sustainability* 10-12 April 2006, Oxford http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk/events/2006-04-10-12/ Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431 OSS Watch: JISC Open Source Advisory Service http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk
Received on Friday, 17 March 2006 03:15:56 UTC