W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: DocBook and ITS

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 11:54:59 +0900
Message-ID: <4418D383.9020008@w3.org>
To: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
Cc: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Hi Jirka,

Jirka Kosek wrote:
> Hi,
> I have written short article about mixing DocBook and ITS. It may be of
> interest for you:
> http://xmlguru.cz/2006/03/docbook-and-its
>             Jirka

Thank you very much for the comments and the DocBook example! I saw you
already started entering them in Bugzilla. Would you mind doing that for
all of them?

Here are some initial, personal replies:

- [I don't think that attributes used inside documentRules element and
its descendants should be prefixed. ]

We need to prefix them if we want to allow for extensions, e.g.
<its:documentRule its:translate="no"

- [provided schema in RELAX NG uses bad naming conventions.]
The schema is not normative, just an automatically generated example. I
would have nothing against this change, though. Please enter this
proposal into bugzilla.

If you have further comments, please go on! However, we will republish
the working draft soon (within the next weeks), so it might be better
for you to wait.

Best regards, Felix.

Received on Thursday, 16 March 2006 02:55:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:04:08 UTC