- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:43:42 +0000
- To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2926 ------- Additional Comments From fsasaki@w3.org 2006-02-23 13:43 ------- (In reply to comment #0) > I think that you need to say something about ambiguous RELAX NG schema that > could lead to conflicting rules, such as for instance: > > <choice> > <element name="p"> > <its:schemaRule its:translate="yes"/> ... > </element> > <element name="p"> > <its:schemaRule its:translate="no"/> ... > </element> > </choice> > > Of course, this is a simplistic example and in practice, ambiguous schemas can > be much more complex to detect and rewrite. > > Eric yes, we need to do say s.t. about that. Actually we have not addressed processing of schemaRule elements at all so far (e.g. how about <p> declared as part of <text> versus <p> declared as part of <footnote>? Who is responsible for finding out which <p> is meant? Do we mandate a schema processor for this? This question arises even without ambiguity. I don't know an answer yet, though.
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2006 13:43:48 UTC