- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:39:18 +0000
- To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2876 ------- Additional Comments From fsasaki@w3.org 2006-02-15 07:39 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Didn't we already discuss metadata like an attribute "version" (along the lines > of XSL or XML for example)? Of course deciding on how to represent versioning > information is only one part of the stories. Others may be: > > 1. What's the version identifier we want to use in the last call? > 2. Will we have minor and major releases? If so: What merits a major release? > 3. Do we have make explicit statements about backwards compatibility? > > Best regards, > Christian So far we are doing none of these. We have to tackle this before May 20 though ....
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2006 07:39:22 UTC