Re: [Fwd: Re: terminology]

Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> Felix Sasaki wrote:
> 
>> - I just recognized that there are various visualization variations now
>> of element and attribute names, see
>> http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html :
>>
>> a) [... the documentRule element ...] (with a link from "documentRule"
>> to the documentRule declaration)
>> b) [... <documentRule> ....] without a link, but typesetting face
>> c)  [... <documentRules> ...] element, with a link as in a).
>>
>> If you still have time to work on this, could you harmonize that?
>>  
>>
> I'm happy to clean that up. If you're not asleep yet, can you put up
> your current state?

Done. It is mainly based on your changes
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JanMar/0169.html
, with one or two additional changes

- Felix

> 
> Sebastian
>