- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:08:01 +0900
- To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@translate.com>
- Cc: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2006 17:08:14 UTC
Yves Savourel wrote: > I was going to propose "dicombobulated" instead of "dislocated", > but "global" does sound better. Should we go for global / local then? It seems that everybody agrees. - Felix > > -ys > > > -----Original Message----- > From: public-i18n-its-request@w3.org [mailto:public-i18n-its-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sebastian Rahtz > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 7:38 AM > To: Lieske, Christian; public-i18n-its@w3.org > Subject: Re: Integrating feedback on the ITS tagset working draft > > > Lieske, Christian wrote: > >> Local/global sounds good although a global rule may only have local >> effect (for example relate only to a single "p" element). >> >> > Normally you don't know that when you write the rule. > Even if you say "//p[@xml:id='theta']", you don't whether that matches zero, one or more instances in the file(s) you are > processing. > > All rules are global, by definition.... > > Sebastian > >
Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2006 17:08:14 UTC