[Fwd: Re: terminology]

Hoops, this should have gone to the list in the first place.

- Felix

Forwarded message 1

  • From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
  • Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:15:25 +0900
  • Subject: Re: terminology
  • To: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@oucs.ox.ac.uk>
  • Message-ID: <43F1C9DD.4080808@w3.org>
Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> Since we no longer have in-situ selectors, we can simplify the language
> a lot. A selector is *always" dislocated, so no need to qualify it with
> "dislocate selector".
> 
> I am hacking the source along these lines
> and will show a "diff" shortly
> 
> sebastian
> 
Sebastian,

I have a telefone conference in a while, so you could work on the
itstagset.odd document directly in the next two hours, if that is
possible for you. I just have uploaded a new version at
http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.odd

- felix

Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2006 12:16:33 UTC