- From: Lieske, Christian <christian.lieske@sap.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 16:26:15 +0200
- To: "Felix Sasaki" <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Cc: "Yves Savourel" <ysavourel@translate.com>, <public-i18n-its@w3.org>
Hello, Please find my replies below. Best, Christian -----Original Message----- From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org] Sent: Donnerstag, 6. April 2006 16:15 To: Lieske, Christian Cc: Yves Savourel; public-i18n-its@w3.org Subject: Re: Versioning ... > I still see a need for a version attribute on the rules element > (beneficial for example for linked rules files since those files > otherwise would not have an indicator to which version they belong). we decided to link via a xlink attribute which points to a file. If the top element of that file has a version attribute, you will take the version. If not, the version is the one indicated at the top element of the including file. Where is the problem / tricky case with this solution? CL> The top-level elements of the file to which the xlink goes is "rules", right? CL> In that case, you would have/need the version element on "rules".
Received on Thursday, 6 April 2006 14:26:31 UTC