- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 14:04:50 +0900
- To: Yves Savourel <yves@opentag.com>
- Cc: public-i18n-its@w3.org, 'Richard Ishida' <ishida@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 6 April 2006 05:05:03 UTC
Hi Yves, agree with all your points, including 5. I will make the changes to the draft, if nobody protests :). Cheers, Felix Yves Savourel wrote: > Hi Felix, > > A few notes (none critical (except maybe #5)): > > > ---1 in first paragraph of 6.6.3: > > "...element markup and there one wants to apply..." > Should be: > "...element markup and where one wants to apply..." > > > ---2: In section 6.6.3 > > I would reverse the order of the bullets (make selector first and rubyText second): It seems more logical. > > > ---3: In Example 21: > > I would replace: its:selector="/body/img[1]/@alt"/> > By: its:selector="/body/img[@src='w3c_home.png']/@alt"/> > > It seems more logical to attached the specified text to a given image file rather than the position of an image element. ...just a > thought. > > > ---4: rubyPointer: > > If we have time, it would be good to have an example with the pointers mechanism (maybe the OpenDocument case), so people understand > better how to use that markup with existing ruby markup. > > > ---5: rubyText attribute: > > Why don't we have a <rubyText> element instead of a rubyText attribute in <rubyRule>? just like <locInfo> in <locInfoRule>. This > would avoid translatable text in an attribute. > > > > That's all for now. > Kenavo, > -yves > >
Received on Thursday, 6 April 2006 05:05:03 UTC