Re: ITS Mapping Update - some inconsistencies found

Renat, thanks for this.

I am using this while transferring the wiki provisions into the XLIFF 2.1
working draft.

Could you please forward the document also to the XLIFF comments list. This
is just a legal precaution to make sure that the contribution is covered by
OASIS feedback policy :-)

Cheers
dF

Dr. David Filip
=======================
OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, and Liaison Officer
LRC | CNGL | CSIS
University of Limerick, Ireland
telephone: +353-6120-2781
*cellphone: +353-86-0222-158*
facsimile: +353-6120-2734
http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452
mailto: david.filip@ul.ie

On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Renat Bikmatov (Logrus.Net) <
renat.bikmatov@logrus.net> wrote:

> Hi Felix, Yves, and All,
>
> Please find attached the copy of mapping specification with our comments
> [SN] added on possible inconsistencies.
>
>
> Regards,
> Renat Bikmatov | IT and Localization Solutions Architect | Senior
> Localization Project Manager | +7 (495) 646-3564, ext. 110
> www.logrus.net
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org]
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 9:35 AM
> To: Renat Bikmatov (Logrus.Net)
> Cc: Yves Savourel; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org; public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org
> Subject: Re: ITS Mapping Update - What is the plan?
>
> Hi Renat,
>
> Am 21.08.2014 um 20:39 schrieb Renat Bikmatov (Logrus.Net) <
> renat.bikmatov@logrus.net>:
>
> > Hi Yves,
> >
> > We are considering to further develop our ITS 2.0 implementation project
> aimed at visualization of content and ITS metadata - this time for XLIFF
> 2.0 content. I asked the developer to look at the ITS 2.0 mapping schema
> for XLIFF 2.0 (http://www.w3.org/International/its/wiki/XLIFF_2.0_Mapping),
> and he has found several inconsistences and/or omissions. So my question is:
> >
> > Do you think it is worth for us to participate in further development
> and debugging of the current ITS-to-XLIFF 2.0 mapping specification (if
> this is still in progress) - OR- Does it make sense to wait until ITS 2.0
> is implemented as XLIFF 2.x Module (hopefully, in near future)?
>
>
> Yves may have a different answer, here is mine: the mapping is being
> developed in the wiki and nothing else has happened in XLIFF TC about it.
> So it would make a lot of sense to know about the inconsistencies and
> omissions here before the mapping is finalized.
>
> Best,
>
> Felix
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Renat Bikmatov | IT and Localization Solutions Architect | Senior
> Localization Project Manager | +7 (495) 646-3564, ext. 110
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yves Savourel [mailto:ysavourel@enlaso.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 5:48 PM
> > To: public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org
> > Cc: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: ITS Mapping Update
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > (CCing the XLIFF TC for information, as the idea is to make this into a
> module)
> >
> > An update on the ITS mapping for XLIFF 2:
> >
> > As discussed in Dublin last month and in this morning ITS-IG call, we
> are looking at classifying the ITS data categories into several classes:
> >
> > - the one for which there is a direct XLIFF mapping (so nothing to
> implement),
> > - the ones partially covered in XLIFF,
> > - the ones without equivalent in XLIFF
> > - the ones that are not metadata (and therefore not really to be
> 'mapped')
> > - and several ones not mapped yet
> >
> > The latest draft is here:
> > https://www.w3.org/International/its/wiki/XLIFF_2.0_Mapping
> >
> > Feedback and suggestions welcome, especially on the data categories not
> mapped yet, like Directionality, Storage Size, etc.
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > -yves
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>