W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org > October 2014

RE: ITS Mapping Update - some inconsistencies found

From: Renat Bikmatov (Logrus.Net) <renat.bikmatov@logrus.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 17:58:49 +0000
To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>, Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
CC: "public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org" <public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4d56e8fdf70644d4876b897b7afa0a0b@CO1PR04MB457.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Felix, Yves, and All,

Please find attached the copy of mapping specification with our comments [SN] added on possible inconsistencies.


Regards,
Renat Bikmatovš| IT and LocalizationšSolutions Architect | Senior Localization Project Managerš|š+7 (495) 646-3564, ext. 110
www.logrus.net


-----Original Message-----
From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org] 
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 9:35 AM
To: Renat Bikmatov (Logrus.Net)
Cc: Yves Savourel; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org; public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org
Subject: Re: ITS Mapping Update - What is the plan?

Hi Renat,

Am 21.08.2014 um 20:39 schrieb Renat Bikmatov (Logrus.Net) <renat.bikmatov@logrus.net>:

> Hi Yves,
> 
> We are considering to further develop our ITS 2.0 implementation project aimed at visualization of content and ITS metadata - this time for XLIFF 2.0 content. I asked the developer to look at the ITS 2.0 mapping schema for XLIFF 2.0 (http://www.w3.org/International/its/wiki/XLIFF_2.0_Mapping), and he has found several inconsistences and/or omissions. So my question is:
> 
> Do you think it is worth for us to participate in further development and debugging of the current ITS-to-XLIFF 2.0 mapping specification (if this is still in progress) - OR- Does it make sense to wait until ITS 2.0 is implemented as XLIFF 2.x Module (hopefully, in near future)?


Yves may have a different answer, here is mine: the mapping is being developed in the wiki and nothing else has happened in XLIFF TC about it. So it would make a lot of sense to know about the inconsistencies and omissions here before the mapping is finalized.

Best,

Felix

> 
> Regards,
> Renat Bikmatov | IT and Localization Solutions Architect | Senior Localization Project Manager | +7 (495) 646-3564, ext. 110
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yves Savourel [mailto:ysavourel@enlaso.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 5:48 PM
> To: public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org
> Cc: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: ITS Mapping Update
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> (CCing the XLIFF TC for information, as the idea is to make this into a module)
> 
> An update on the ITS mapping for XLIFF 2:
> 
> As discussed in Dublin last month and in this morning ITS-IG call, we are looking at classifying the ITS data categories into several classes:
> 
> - the one for which there is a direct XLIFF mapping (so nothing to implement),
> - the ones partially covered in XLIFF,
> - the ones without equivalent in XLIFF
> - the ones that are not metadata (and therefore not really to be 'mapped')
> - and several ones not mapped yet
> 
> The latest draft is here:
> https://www.w3.org/International/its/wiki/XLIFF_2.0_Mapping
> 
> Feedback and suggestions welcome, especially on the data categories not mapped yet, like Directionality, Storage Size, etc.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> -yves
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 




Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2014 17:59:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:11:31 UTC