RE: XLIFF maping layout

Sure. itsxlf is a bit long but would be fine.
or itsm? ixlf?

-ys

-----Original Message-----
From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org] 
Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2013 4:34 AM
To: Yves Savourel
Cc: public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org
Subject: Re: XLIFF maping layout

Hi Yves, all,

thanks for starting this. One question on I think all the three (XLIFF general, 1.2, 2.0) mapping pages: they say

"itsx: is a schema prefix for the namespace http://www.w3.org/ns/its-xliff/"

wouldn't it be less confusing to use a different prefix for its-xliff? 
The itsx prefix is mostly used for extensions to ITS 1.0 and ITS 2.0 in general, with the namespace uri http://www.w3.org/2008/12/its-extensions

Btw., I have updated the extension namespace "its-extensions" doc to now cover also ITS 2.0.

Best,

Felix


Am 19.05.13 02:18, schrieb Yves Savourel:
>> Also, I suggest we progress the XLIFF1.2 and 2.0 mapping on different 
>> pages...
> Mapping for XLIFF 1.2 is here:
> http://www.w3.org/International/its/wiki/XLIFF_1.2_Mapping
>
> Mapping for XLIFF 2.0 is here:
> http://www.w3.org/International/its/wiki/XLIFF_2.0_Mapping
>
> We can replace the text in the old table by pointers (like it's done for Translate) as we make progress.
> Then we can just point to the two pages when all is done.
>
> -ys
>
>

Received on Sunday, 19 May 2013 11:24:28 UTC