Re: ACTION-515: language tag in ITS ontology

[moving to ITS IG list]

I had second thoughts on 'domain' needing language tag. I forgot the 
attribute is 'domains' and can be the result of processing the 
domainMapping attribute and may contain several domain names. As i 
result i can't see any way one could _ensure_ the text in the attribute 
would all be in the same language (especially as the mapping may bridge 
between the client's domain terminology on one language and and LSP's  
in another).

So I suggest we drop 'domains' as an RDF attribute that needs a language 
tag, and stick just with 'locNote' and 'LocQualityIssueComment'.

any thoughts - Felix, Sebastien?

cheers,
Dave

On 18/06/2013 16:53, Dave Lewis wrote:
> Hi all,
> With refernece to the ITS ontolog at:
> http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its/rdf-content/its-rdf.html#
>
> I think the following string attributes would benefit from having a 
> language tag:
>
> 1) locNote
> 2) locQualityIssueComment
> 3) domain
>
> I considered it for proveance: person, tool, org, revPerson, revTool, 
> revOrg
> but there was no obvious benefit as far as I can see.
>
> thoughts?
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
>
>