- From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@translate.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:34:27 -0700
- To: <public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org>
> 1. I could imagine that idValue is needed/could be used > without any relationship to the translate data category. > As such, you could aim for a completely new data category. > Possible implementation > <its:idRule selector="//source/@name"/> That's a good idea, but the rule would probably an associated selection to be useful something like: <its:idRule selector="//source" idValue="@name"/> > 2. Would it make sense to mention that the new mechanism > only is needed in cases where the best practice > http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-i18n-bp/#AuthUniqueID was not taken into account? +1 > 4. Possibly, a reference back to http://esw.w3.org/topic/its0505ReqUniqueID > would be valuable. +1 -ys
Received on Friday, 19 February 2010 01:35:53 UTC