Re: Atom Bidi Draft Last Call

>The Atom Bidi draft [1] has entered last call.  I posted an updated 
>version of the draft today indicating "Experimental" status rather than 
>"Standards Track".  The draft is currently implemented by Apache Abdera 
>and the Lotus Connections Blogs component.  Additional implementation 
>and feedback are requested.
>
>- James
>
>[1] http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-snell-atompub-bidi-06.txt

i.e.
urn:ietf:id:draft-snell-atompub-bidi-06
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-snell-atompub-bidi-06


Editorial comments. You could add 
- http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-its-20070403/#directionality as 
informative references, in Section 5.2 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-snell-atompub-bidi-06#section-5.2
- Why create atom:dir instead of re-use its:dir (in a Rationale section). 
- What are the differences between atom:dir and its:dir . 


others references/see also
- the various discussions (including 
http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/msg04474.html 
http://bitworking.org/news/Not_Invented_Here ) wich leaded/caused 
urn:ietf:rfc:4287 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4287 to: 
  - create its own xml elements atom:author, atom:published, 
  atom:summary, and do not re-use dc: elements
  - do not create its own lang attribute and allow xml:dir
- my previous mail about this subject/topic 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2006OctDec/0003.html 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2007AprJun/0017.html 
- http://www.w3.org/blog/International/2008/03/26/internationalization_tag_set_interest_gr
http://www.w3.org/International/its/ig/

Received on Monday, 14 April 2008 21:01:00 UTC