- From: Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 10:36:44 -0700
- To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, indic <public-i18n-indic@w3.org>, prashant verma <vermaprashant1@gmail.com>, Somnath Chandra <schandra@mit.gov.in>
On 9/29/2014 12:44 PM, Richard Ishida wrote:
> These are review comments on
> http://www.w3.org/International/docs/indic-layout/
>
I have an additional comment:
>
> Section 5 ABNF ...
>
> [1] "needs to be evolved" -> "is provided here"
>
> [2] "V(upper case) is complete vowel"
> I think the generally used term is 'independent vowel', no?
I support the suggestion that that would be a better term.
Also, I believe in
Rule 2 : {CH}C[v][m]
it is incorrect to say that { } represents "1 or more" because clearly
"C" by itself is a syllable
(Shown in the examples below).
So, I think the intent was "0 or more".
Also, the following statement is slightly vague as originally presented.
I have suggested edits in [].
"C is [a] consonant as per Unicode['s] definition which may or may not
include [a single] nukta"
A./
PS: as I'm not on the indic list, if my post doesn't show up there,
could someone forward it. Thx.
Received on Friday, 3 October 2014 17:36:51 UTC