- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 17:53:26 +0100
- To: <public-i18n-geo@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Deborah Cawkwell'" <deborah.cawkwell@bbc.co.uk>
AGENDA
I18N GEO TF teleconference
Please feel free to suggest additional items for the agenda.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day : Wednesday
Date : 17 September 2003
Start : 19:00 UTC, 20:00 UK, 12noon Pacific, 3pm Eastern,
5am Australia (next day!)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bridge : +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)
with conference code 4186 (spells "I18N")
Duration : 60-90 minutes
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zakim information : http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
Zakim bridge monitor : http://www.w3.org/1998/12/bridge/Zakim.html
Zakim IRC bot : http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** indicates a topic that will receive particular attention this week
Draft agenda
============
REVIEW OF AGENDA
REVIEW OF ACTIONS (see below)
ACTION: Lloyd, write up some code samples relating to date formats and
link to them from the Q&A page at a later date
All: send in pointers to existing guidelines
REVIEW OF DEPENDENCIES (see below)
HTML (SP): Approve para re application/xml+xhtml for bidi CSS vs markup
Q&A
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-geo/2003Jul/0028.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-geo/2003Jul/0029.html
HTML (SP & MI): help clarify how charset information should be declared
for html and xhtml 1.0 pages
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-geo/2003Jul/0033.html
MEETINGS:
-
NEW MEMBERS
**** Francois Richard
INFO SHARE
**** [Here you can contribute news or informative titbits about
events, developments, etc that affect our work. It is information share
only - if processing is needed we should add an agenda item - although
of course clarification questions are allowed.]
**** RI: ISO thinking of charging royalties for use of country and
language codes
UPDATES ON FRAMEWORK ACTIVITY
-
SPECIAL TOPICS
Review of WG work items (current and potential)
- Guidelines devt
FAQ development
Articles: Phil's introduction to web i18n; Richard's bidi
background; ...
Framework activity (including WAI collaboration)
Usability work: developing web site; reviewing content &
architecture; testing approach
Test suite development & results gathering
Other outreach coordination
FAQ REVIEW
Last chance review
**** LLOYD (again)!
http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-accept-lang-locales.html
This is still awaiting update by Richard to incorporate Addison's
comments. Try again tomorrow.
First discussion
**** RUSS !
TBD
UPCOMING Q&A ASSIGNMENTS
------------------------------------------------------
Send to group Publish
(latest)
Martin: DONE 25 June
Richard: DONE 2 July
Tex/Phil: DONE 9 July
Richard: DONE 16 July [css vs markup for bidi]
Lloyd: DONE
Tex DONE 31 July [what is bidi & which langs]
Andrew DONE 6 August
Martin DONE 13 aug
Richard DONE 20 aug [intnl vs mlingl sites]
Tbd 18 aug
Tbd 25 aug
Tex - 9 sept
Lloyd - 17 sept
Russ 15 sept 24 sept
Andrew 22 sept 1 oct
RI/Martin 29 sept 8 oct
**** More assignments
GUIDELINES REVIEW
**** Richard's edits to the Authoring Guidelines arising from the FTF
http://www.w3.org/International/geo/html-tech/
This will be worked on further by tomorrow.
**** Martin's proposals for section 2.2 incorporating XHTML served as
html or xml and use or not of xml declaration
TBD
**** Richard's bidi backgrounder
http://people.w3.org/rishida/scripts/bidi/
- Andrew's proposal for addition to guidelines 2.2
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-geo/2003Jul/0060.html
DISCUSSION
- is there an issue with Mac browsers and utf-8?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-geo/2003Jul/0002.html
- should we limit ourselves to xhtml served as text/html for the
guidelines?
- should we be concerned with distinguishing behaviour for
DOCTYPE related 'standards mode', 'almost standards mode' and
'quirks mode'
- what should we do wrt distinguishing behaviour for
XHTML served as text/html or app/xml or app/xhtml+xml?
- should we assume the use of xml declaration for xhtml 1, or
factor in that many won't use it?
eg.
http://www.webstandards.org/learn/reference/prolog_problems.html
EDUCATION & OUTREACH
- Article by Phil and co.
AOB
================================================
Details:
GUIDELINES CONTENT OWNERS
================
Steve
Anything in section 3 (character sets, encoding, entities)
[first priority]
Anything in section 10 (Objects)
Martin
character sets & encodings in forms
Lloyd
Forms
Richard
Bidi
Russ
automatic layout
Andrew
i was thinking of jotting down some notes on the following
areas, and
then seeing what i could add to other sections.
3 Character sets, character encodings and entities
4 Specifying the language of content
5 Text direction
6.4 Ruby
7 Lists
8 Tables
8.1 Mirroring tables in bidirectional text
15 Writing source text
John
Navigation
============
Richard Ishida
W3C
contact info: http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/
http://www.w3.org/International/
http://www.w3.org/International/geo/
See the W3C Internationalization FAQ page
http://www.w3.org/International/questions.html
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2003 12:53:55 UTC