- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 17:00:48 +0100
- To: <public-i18n-geo@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Arko, Phil'" <phil.arko@scr.siemens.com>
Phil, Many thanks for doing this ! Its quite depressing, but good to know. I am copying to the rest of the group, as this is valuable information. I noticed a couple of additional things over and above what you said. Let me try to summarise all below: General - several shots include an unusually small aleph - this may due to the font - pretty much all Mac browsers tested struggled to display ...<p><img align="right".../></p></div> without the graphic being displayed below the bottom of the div --- I changed the code to hopefully avoid this by using ...<p dir="rtl"><img ../></p></div> instead Safari - seems to support Arabic well, and does exhibit the expected behaviour wrt spacing before </span>, but... - doesn't mirror parens ! Mac Mozilla - seems to support Arabic ok, but... - does weird things with spaces - they are very wide - extraneous space introduced in last test ie. aaaaaa ( W3C) aaaaaa - doesn't exhibit expected behaviour wrt space before </span> Mac NN6 - doesn't support Unicode characters.... - doesn't recognise Unicode characters - all displayed as ? (does, however, right align <p dir="rtl">) - *very* weird handling of last test, ie. (aaaaaW3Caaaaa) rather than aaaaa (W3C) aaaaaa Mac IE - doesn't support Arabic display... - displays Latin1 characters rather than arabic - doesn't even right align <p dir="rtl"> As time goes on I'm thinking more and more that it would be good to develop tests for each technique that we could run on a variety of browsers to check applicability, and link to these tests from the techniques themselves. I believe WCAG is doing the same thing. I guess we should also begin opening channels with the various browser development teams. Cheers, RI ============ Richard Ishida W3C tel: +44 1753 480 292 http://www.w3.org/International/ http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Arko, Phil [mailto:phil.arko@scr.siemens.com] > Sent: 03 July 2003 14:26 > To: 'ishida@w3.org' > Subject: viewing our pages in mac browsers > > > Hi Richard, > > Just following up on the Mac browser issue... The things that > I mentioned were fixed (the Euro sign, and the extra bullet > on the "more" lines). I did notice some problems with the > bidi question though. I took several screenshots from my > PowerBook G4, running Mac OS X 10.2 / Jaguar edition (see the > attached screenshots). > > Safari -- This is quickly becoming an extremely popular > browser for Mac OS X because it is integrated with the look & > feel of the rest of the OS X environment, and it is the > fastest browser available. It displays the characters > properly, but there is just one small misallignment with the > "result" line in both the Background and the Answer (as is > the case with all of these browsers. > > MS Internet Explorer -- While Unicode is native to the Mac > OS, Microsoft has not implemented it into its Mac-based > applications, so Internet Explorer does not properly display > the text (there is no user preference that can fix this). IE > has been quite popular on the Mac. > > Netscape -- This used to be (I believe) the most popular > browser for the Mac, so many people still use Netscape > because of habit. The Unicode doesn't display properly. > > Mozilla -- This is less popular, but there is a small loyal > group that uses Mozilla because of the tabbed browser window > feature (as well as a few other features). > > I know that most general users tend to use a Windows-based > system, but Macs have been very popular for designers and > content authors that don't want to worry about the technology > required to write a simple article. > > <<mac screenshots.zip>> >
Received on Friday, 4 July 2003 12:01:00 UTC