Re: suggestions

At 17:42 03/07/24 -0400, Tex Texin wrote:

>I think as a name "W3C Internationalization FAQ" is fine, but it is non-unqiue
>so if anyone googles for that title they get 2780 other pages, and it is hard
>to narrow it down further.

Good point. That is of course okay if we are at the top.
And it should be possible to do that because:
- W3C does seem to have quite a bit of Google-Karma
- We will have all three words, in that order, in the title,...
- We will of course produce more and more content and will
   be linked from other places

So I'm not too worried, but of course if we have a better idea,
I don't object.

Regards,    Martin.


>Almost all web pages about web technology mention W3C, many have FAQs, and a
>good number mention internationalization...
>
>Personally, I would stick the GEO in there to make it identifiable and credit
>the group, while making it clear in the text or somewhere that it is open to
>others in (just?) the WG to submit.
>
>If not GEO, let's make up some other acronym or identifier that is memorable
>and uniquely searchable to make it easy to find.
>
>Anyone got any fun acronyms?
>
>TWINQ (pronounced twink!) The Web InternationalizatioN Questions
>WIN-FAQ
>
>Richard's I18n Almanac? ;-)
>
>(I'll work on this later...)
>tex
>
>Richard Ishida wrote:
> >
> > Title repaired. Thanks.
> >
> > The page heading shouldn't say GEO, since this is a WG thing - although
> > we do mention that GEO members are principally responsible. (I'm still
> > hoping that we might get occasional contributions from core and ws
> > folks).
> >
> > I too have been wondering about the "Questions & Answers" thing lately.
> > I'm very tempted to call this a FAQ list - like everyone else does, and
> > like I had to to explain clearly what it was while doing outreach at
> > LISA.
> >
> > Why don't we rechristen it as "W3C Internationalization FAQ" ?
> >
> > Votes or counter proposals, please.
> > RI

Received on Thursday, 24 July 2003 18:20:18 UTC