- From: Tex Texin <tex@i18nguy.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 17:42:58 -0400
- To: ishida@w3.org
- CC: "'GEO'" <public-i18n-geo@w3.org>
I think as a name "W3C Internationalization FAQ" is fine, but it is non-unqiue so if anyone googles for that title they get 2780 other pages, and it is hard to narrow it down further. Almost all web pages about web technology mention W3C, many have FAQs, and a good number mention internationalization... Personally, I would stick the GEO in there to make it identifiable and credit the group, while making it clear in the text or somewhere that it is open to others in (just?) the WG to submit. If not GEO, let's make up some other acronym or identifier that is memorable and uniquely searchable to make it easy to find. Anyone got any fun acronyms? TWINQ (pronounced twink!) The Web InternationalizatioN Questions WIN-FAQ Richard's I18n Almanac? ;-) (I'll work on this later...) tex Richard Ishida wrote: > > Title repaired. Thanks. > > The page heading shouldn't say GEO, since this is a WG thing - although > we do mention that GEO members are principally responsible. (I'm still > hoping that we might get occasional contributions from core and ws > folks). > > I too have been wondering about the "Questions & Answers" thing lately. > I'm very tempted to call this a FAQ list - like everyone else does, and > like I had to to explain clearly what it was while doing outreach at > LISA. > > Why don't we rechristen it as "W3C Internationalization FAQ" ? > > Votes or counter proposals, please. > RI
Received on Thursday, 24 July 2003 17:46:15 UTC