Re: Restructuring of Tibetan Layout Requirements

Thanks a lot, Richard. I'll check it out.

I updated the language switching code last year[1] and it should work. I 
can translate it when I have time, but before I do that, I agree that 
you can remove the Chinese translation from the document.

~xfq

[1] https://github.com/w3c/tlreq/pull/6

On 2023-07-04 23:27, r12a wrote:
> Btw, the Chinese translation only ever covered a small proportion of
> the text, and much of that was removed with the latest edits.  I think
> that the scripts used to manage the switch between translations may
> also be out of date now.
> 
> So i propose that i remove the remaining Chinese translations from the
> document, and associated markup and scripting.
> 
> Any objections?
> 
> ri
> 
> r12a wrote on 04/07/2023 16:23:
> 
>> I just posted a first cut at reduction and reorganisation of the
>> document.
>> https://w3c.github.io/tlreq/
>> 
>> If you want to see the changes, there are so many that i recommend
>> comparing with
>> https://www.w3.org/TR/tlreq/
>> 
>> Apart from the orthography overview, the sections containing the
>> real technical details about layout still need to be addressed, I
>> have begun work on that, but it isn't yet published to GH.
>> 
>> I also made some additions to the respec_2022.css style sheet,
>> mostly related to transcriptions.
>> 
>> ri
>> 
>> Fuqiao Xue wrote on 04/07/2023 04:26:
>> Hi Richard,
>> 
>> Since no one is currently actively maintaining the tlreq doc, I
>> won't object to removing these sections and pointing to more
>> up-to-date content in your document.
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> 
>> ~xfq
>> 
>> On 2023-07-04 00:47, r12a wrote:
>> chaps,
>> 
>> I'd like to remove a lot of the material from the tlreq doc, since
>> it
>> was copied from my doc at
>> https://r12a.github.io/scripts/tibt/bo.html
>> and my document is more up to date.  There are also a couple of
>> unnecessary sections, such as the character list in Appendix D.
>> 
>> Instead, i'd point to my document for an overview of how the script
>> works, and the tlreq doc would focus on the layout stuff.
>> 
>> I'm attaching a TOC with an indication of which sections i propose
>> to
>> delete.
>> 
>> I'd also then like to apply some reorganisations to the remaining
>> material.  This is a very old document, and needs a bit of a
>> refresh.
>> 
>> Any objections?
>> 
>> ri

Received on Wednesday, 5 July 2023 02:18:58 UTC