- From: John C Klensin <john+w3c@jck.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 08:56:06 -0500
- To: r12a <ishida@w3.org>, Internationalization Working Group <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
It seems to me that, if we are going to ban abbreviations that
have existed in English for centuries and that appear in almost
every competent dictionary (whether rooted in Latin, assorted
variations on Anglo-Saxon, proto-British, or something else)
then, out of deference to non-first-language speakers and
readers, we should also ban recent neologisms, contrived
abbreviations, and excesses of contrived cuteness. Presumably
that effort should start with a ban on "W3C" and "I18n".
Mumble.
john
--On Wednesday, February 22, 2023 09:39 +0000 r12a
<ishida@w3.org> wrote:
> Did we really recommend this? Do we still recommend it?
>
> https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1045#issuecomment-14
> 37594686
>
> ri
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2023 13:56:25 UTC