- From: Daniel Burnett <daniel.burnett@consensys.net>
- Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 16:53:19 -0500
- To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>
- Cc: Matt Stone <mstone@thebrightlink.com>, "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, Grant Noble <grant.noble@consensys.net>, "Richard Ishida (ishida@w3.org)" <ishida@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJ-gw3GgkLgn0B1nqVwX0hBwsrhcSMj=hU57gTz=5Yk2=Ux87A@mail.gmail.com>
Wow, thanks for the fast turnaround! I have labelled the issues as requested. -- dan On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 4:07 PM Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com> wrote: > Hello Daniel and Matt, > > > > Thanks for the opportunity to review your Spec. I have just now filed two > issues. There is one more pending issue. > > > > Could you please ensure that the ‘i18n-comment’ label is affixed to each > issue—this enables automatic tracking in our group’s digests, radar, and > other tools. > > > > If, when you have a chance to review the issues, you have any questions or > concerns, feel free to reach out to our WG. In most cases, making comments > in the github issue is sufficient, but if you need “higher bandwidth” let > me know. > > > > Regards, > > > > Addison > > > > Addison Phillips > > Sr. Principal SDE – I18N (Amazon) > > Chair (W3C I18N WG) > > > > Internationalization is not a feature. > > It is an architecture. > > > > > > > > *From:* Daniel Burnett [mailto:daniel.burnett@consensys.net] > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 26, 2019 5:43 PM > *To:* Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com> > *Cc:* www-international@w3.org; Matt Stone <mstone@thebrightlink.com>; > Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>; Dave Longley < > dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>; Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>; > Grant Noble <grant.noble@consensys.net> > *Subject:* Re: REQUEST for (updated?) review: Verifiable Credentials Data > Model 1.0 > > > > We understand. Thank you. > > > > -- dan > > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 12:42 PM Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com> > wrote: > > Hello Daniel and Verifiable Claims WG, > > > > Thanks for the request. I have added your spec to our review radar [1]. > > > > Please note that 2 weeks really is not enough time for I18N to do a > review. We will do our best to accommodate (and given that we had no > comments last time, this may remain a no-op), but you should also note that > this gives you little time to react to any comments we give. > > > > Regards, > > > > Addison > > > > Addison Phillips > > Sr. Principal SDE – I18N (Amazon) > > Chair (W3C I18N WG) > > > > Internationalization is not a feature. > > It is an architecture. > > > > [1] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/projects/1 > > [a] https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/636 > > > > *From:* Daniel Burnett [mailto:daniel.burnett@consensys.net] > *Sent:* Monday, February 18, 2019 5:39 AM > *To:* www-international@w3.org > *Cc:* Matt Stone <mstone@thebrightlink.com>; Manu Sporny < > msporny@digitalbazaar.com>; Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>; > Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>; Grant Noble < > grant.noble@consensys.net> > *Subject:* REQUEST for (updated?) review: Verifiable Credentials Data > Model 1.0 > > > > Hi, > > > > The Verifiable Claims Working Group's one standards-track specification, > "Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0", has some editorial work to go but > is otherwise ready for Candidate Recommendation. > > > > I don't believe we received any comments from you after our request last > year, but we would like to offer another opportunity for comments or > questions. In particular, based on community feedback we have added two > new features to the specification, a new JWT-based syntactic representation > [1] and support for Zero-Knowledge Proofs [2]. A broader list of changes > can be found in the "Status of this Document" section of the most recently > published static Working Draft [3]. > > > > As before, the best place for comments is directly in our GitHub repo [4] > as new issues, but comments sent to our comments mailing list [5] work as > well. It would be best to base any review and comments on the live > Editor's Draft [6]. Given that our Working Group charter expires at the > end of March, and that we are expected to publish the Candidate > Recommendation before then, we would greatly appreciate any comments you > can give us by **March 4th, 2019** . > > > > If you need anything else from us, please don't hesitate to contact the > chairs directly. > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > Dan Burnett and Matt Stone, Co-chairs, Verifiable Claims Working Group > > > > CC: Specification editors > > > > > > [1] JWT: https://w3c.github.io/vc-data-model/#json-web-token > > [2] ZKP: https://w3c.github.io/vc-data-model/#zero-knowledge-proofs > > [3] Most recent dated (fixed) draft: > https://www.w3.org/TR/2019/WD-verifiable-claims-data-model-20190208/ > > [4] GitHub repo: https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model > > [5] Mailing list: public-vc-comments@w3.org > > [6] Tip of tree editor's draft: https://w3c.github.io/vc-data-model/ > > > >
Received on Monday, 4 March 2019 21:53:59 UTC