W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-core@w3.org > April to June 2016

RE: review of qa-floating-times.en.html - additional article?

From: Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 20:50:47 +0000
To: "ishida@w3.org" <ishida@w3.org>, "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Message-ID: <ed1f7db1f0964864afd575a2a7fd5a24@EX13D08UWB002.ant.amazon.com>
Hi Richard,

In general, I think this is a good thing.

I have a long list of particular observations about your summary of terms, though. How would you like those?

Addison

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ishida@w3.org [mailto:ishida@w3.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 12:37 PM
> To: public-i18n-core@w3.org
> Subject: Re: review of qa-floating-times.en.html - additional article?
> 
> On 25/05/2016 16:07, ishida@w3.org wrote:
> > On 16/05/2016 18:52, Phillips, Addison wrote:
> >> This has been a long standing action item for me that I'd like to
> >> complete. Could you please review this link and send comments to the
> >> list:
> >>
> >> http://w3c.github.io/i18n-drafts/questions/qa-floating-times.en.html

> 
> hi Addison, all,
> 
> this is a follow-up to a few points on my last email on this topic.
> Today i was working through the time and date stuff in HTML5, and i threw
> together a page to help me remember the various terms.  I uploaded it at
> 
> http://w3c.github.io/i18n-drafts/articles/definitions-time/index.en

> 
> most of the text is lifted from the Timezones Note.
> 
> i suspect that with just a small amount of extra work it would be possible to
> turn it into a real article for publication.  We could then refer to it to answer
> the question "What are floating times".
> 
> let me know what you (all) think.
> ri
> 

Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2016 20:51:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:02:12 UTC