- From: <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 20:32:23 +0100
- To: Chaals McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, intlcore <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
On 15/04/2016 19:03, Chaals McCathie Nevile wrote: > in https://www.w3.org/International/track/products/5 there are two > issues listed. I wonder if they are live, and if that isn't known > whether there is someone who can figure it out faster and more > accurately than I. > > It would be nice to get through them for HTML 5.1, which we're > effectively aiming to do on a timeline that means we'll freeze at the > end of May, with stuff after that going to whatever the next version is. hi Chaals, thanks for the heads-up. first, note that we're now tracking those issues on github at https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/labels/html (i'll close the tracker versions now you have pointed out to me that i missed them). for https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/117 i'm thinking we should just close this - i'll check with the i18n WG for https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/33 this is as much a question as a suggestion haven't looked at it in great detail for https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/32 see the ongoing thread at https://www.w3.org/Mail/flatten/index?subject=Expected+behaviour+of+quotation+marks+&list=public-digipub-ig (especially my email sent today where i postulate that html may need to change - still haven't got clear decisions there yet though) ri
Received on Friday, 15 April 2016 19:32:34 UTC