W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-core@w3.org > January to March 2015

I18N-ISSUE-424: Why not ABNF/EBNF? ⓟ [WebVTT]

From: Internationalization Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 01:26:09 +0000
To: public-i18n-core@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1YQnDN-0000Rq-MI@deneb.w3.org>
I18N-ISSUE-424: Why not ABNF/EBNF? ⓟ [WebVTT]


Raised by: Addison Phillips
On product: WebVTT


The document structure is described as a sequence of prose. Wouldn't it be better to describe it as a grammar using an established syntax such as EBNF?
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2015 01:26:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:02:05 UTC