RE: Urgent: Encoding spec status

I'm working on the missing respec references this morning in between things. I just have to push them up on github. After that, I'll update our editor's copy using the 5 September version (no need to FPWD the earlier one we currently have). 

Anne, if you plan to do any updates in the very near future, let me know so we can take that instead.

Addison

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Ishida [mailto:ishida@w3.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 9:02 AM
> To: Anne van Kesteren
> Cc: Phillips, Addison; public-i18n-core@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Urgent: Encoding spec status
> 
> I'm happy to push the document through the publication process as a FPWD,
> and we may be able to publish it this week.
> 
> I need to know which version to publish though. (Is the 5 sep version the one
> that you're talking about Anne?)
> 
> Addison, if we publish a different version from the current editor's draft at
> /International, is it just a question of changing the respec information?
> 
> RI
> 
> 
> On 10/09/2013 16:50, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com>
> wrote:
> >> We (W3C) can publish a working draft of our version any time. I'm also set
> up to take updates from Anne as needed. I see there is a version dated 5
> September that I can take now. I'll let Anne comment on the relative status of
> the WhatWG version.
> >
> > It's WHATWG.
> >
> > There's still some open issues, but I've made some substantial
> > improvements around error handling. I plan on making the algorithms
> > and encoding "class hierarchy" a bit clearer too, as well as
> > explaining the concept of streams more clearly.
> >
> > What's most important still is implementation feedback. The API has
> > been implemented and is generally found useful. Implementations have
> > started tweaking their encoding tables and label data, but it's still
> > a long way to go.
> >
> > Could we please communicate in public about this going forward? A
> > simple cc to www-archive would be fine for me.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Richard Ishida

Received on Tuesday, 10 September 2013 16:21:53 UTC