Re: Discuss IRI progress with W3C I18N WG

Hello Richard,

Given the recent mail from Sam Ruby, I strongly agree that ruby markup 
should really get priority over IRIs at this time.

Regards,    Martin.

On 2012/02/18 3:34, John O'Conner wrote:
> I think it will be acceptable to both our guests Larry and Peter to attend
> the following week if you believe there will be time allotment problems.
>
> Regards,
> John O'Conner
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2/17/12 6:07 AM, "Richard Ishida"<ishida@w3.org>  wrote:
>
>> Just noting that we have already invited Mike Smith to discuss how to
>> move ruby forward with us at next week's meeting. We should take that
>> into account wrt agenda timing.
>>
>> RI
>>
>>
>> On 17/02/2012 01:07, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
>>> I think one point that should be on the agenda for this topic is to what
>>> extent and when the I18N WG would be able to review the document(s) from
>>> the IRI WG.
>>>
>>> Regards, Martin.
>>>
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 00:56:16 UTC