- From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:55:42 +0900
- To: "John O'Conner" <jooconne@adobe.com>
- CC: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Hello Richard, Given the recent mail from Sam Ruby, I strongly agree that ruby markup should really get priority over IRIs at this time. Regards, Martin. On 2012/02/18 3:34, John O'Conner wrote: > I think it will be acceptable to both our guests Larry and Peter to attend > the following week if you believe there will be time allotment problems. > > Regards, > John O'Conner > > > > > > > On 2/17/12 6:07 AM, "Richard Ishida"<ishida@w3.org> wrote: > >> Just noting that we have already invited Mike Smith to discuss how to >> move ruby forward with us at next week's meeting. We should take that >> into account wrt agenda timing. >> >> RI >> >> >> On 17/02/2012 01:07, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote: >>> I think one point that should be on the agenda for this topic is to what >>> extent and when the I18N WG would be able to review the document(s) from >>> the IRI WG. >>> >>> Regards, Martin. >>> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 00:56:16 UTC