Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?

On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 12:28:03PM +0200, Felix Sasaki wrote:
> > Paragraph or sentence may be up for discussion, but not mentioning it would
> > be a very sad omission.
> 
> I agree. Antoine, in case you see a place where this would fit without being
> "too prominent", please provide a pointer.

Felix, all,

If we were to insert a pointer, to what resource should it point?  To [1], [2],
[3], [4]...?

Tom

[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3987
[2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-07
[3] http://www.w3.org/International/articles/idn-and-iri/
[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationalized_Resource_Identifier

-- 
Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>

Received on Thursday, 8 September 2011 13:19:40 UTC