- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 11:46:55 -0400
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- CC: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>, public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Hi, Robin- Robin Berjon wrote (on 4/27/10 12:21 PM): > > On Apr 27, 2010, at 18:13 , Phillips, Addison wrote: >> A project to implement this could go quite fast, I think, but would >> require agreement by the major browser vendors and a place to do >> the work. We could do this at W3C, but I think ECMA should be >> involved from early on. > > In general a good place for discussion that involves W3C/TC39 > coordination is public-script-coord@w3.org. It doesn't have an > attached group and therefore cannot publish specifications, but > that's a sausage-making detail that can be handled orthogonally (we > just need to find a WG that can justify having this in its charter). Actually, public-script-coord is associated with the WebApps WG, and was formed to coordinate between TC39 and the WebApps WG, specifically on Web IDL issues, but also on other matters of coordination. If we do decide to bring this i18n work to W3C (which I think would be a good idea, though not by necessity in the WebApps WG), we could reuse public-script-coord, or we could make a new dedicated list. I think the latter makes more sense, since the i18n folks wouldn't have to drink from the public-script-coord hose. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
Received on Tuesday, 4 May 2010 15:46:58 UTC