- From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:45:21 +0100
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, "Phillips, Addison" <addison@amazon.com>
- Cc: "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>, "Lisa Dusseault (lisa.dusseault@gmail.com)" <lisa.dusseault@gmail.com>
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 5:51 AM, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com> wrote:
> Almost all of the work needed at this point has little
> to do with internationalization, and much more around
> error handling, specification coordination, dealing
> with versioning and conformance relationships,
> as well as managing through the IETF and W3C processes.
>
> Your help, especially in the last, would be greatly
> appreciated.
Indeed.
I also think that the most important thing at this point is to get all
relevant people in one room in order to discuss how to move things
forward.
> Larry
> --
> http://larry.masinter.net
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phillips, Addison [mailto:addison@amazon.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 8:28 AM
> To: Larry Masinter; Lisa Dusseault; Alexey Melnikov
> Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org
> Subject: RE: draft agenda for IRI working group BOF, and draft charter for IRI
>
> Hi Larry,
>
> Historically our W3C Working Group has managed this work, but I don't think we would be opposed to seeing an IETF WG for this purpose.
>
> Addison
>
> Addison Phillips
> Chair -- W3C Internationalization WG
>
> Internationalization is not a feature.
> It is an architecture.
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: uri-request@w3.org [mailto:uri-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of
>> Larry Masinter
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 5:59 AM
>> To: Lisa Dusseault; Alexey Melnikov
>> Subject: draft agenda for IRI working group BOF, and draft charter
>> for IRI
>>
>> (bcc www-tag, public-html, apps-discuss, w3c/ietf policy, idna-
>> update, http-wg & various individuals)
>>
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-iri/2009Sep/0076.html
>>
>> sent (and further discussion) => public-iri@w3.org
>>
>> "While I am still hoping a working group isn't necessary, the
>> fallback is to start an IETF working group. This message
>> proposes an agenda for a meeting to form the working group
>> ("BOF" at IETF 76) and a draft charter...."
>>
>> Larry
>> --
>> http://larry.masinter.net
Received on Thursday, 24 September 2009 06:45:57 UTC