- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:45:36 +0100
- To: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org, www-style@w3.org
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:26:22 +0100, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> To wit, weird XML vocabularies that have XML names using the two >> variants of e.g. ë would change in meaning (and return different >> results), but I suppose this is highly theoretical. > > I understand that XML does not require parse-time Unicode normalization. > Does it forbid it? Per the grammar you should be able to get a non-normalized tree and should not suddenly end up with, say, a tree normalized to NFC. It does not explicitly forbid it, but it does not forbid throwing a non namespace well-formedness error on Sundays either. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 2 February 2009 11:46:40 UTC