- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 22:42:25 -0000
- To: <public-webcgm@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Thank you. The i18n WG is satisfied by this response. RI ============ Richard Ishida Internationalization Lead W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) http://www.w3.org/International/ http://rishida.net/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Thierry Michel [mailto:tmichel@w3.org] > Sent: 19 December 2008 16:00 > To: Richard Ishida > Cc: public-webcgm@w3.org; public-i18n-core@w3.org > Subject: Response to WebCGM 2.1 Last Call comment: i18n comment 4: > Stripping out all whitespace > > Dear Richard, > > The WebCGM Working Group has reviewed the comment you sent [1] about > the > WebCGM 2.1 Last Call Working Draft [2] published on 02 October 2008. > Thank you for having taken the time to review the document and send us > comments. > > The Working Group's response resolution to your comment is included > below. > > Please review it carefully and acknowledge this WebCGM WG response by > replying to this mail and copying the WebCGM public mailing list > <public-webcgm@w3.org>. Let us know if you agree with it or not before > 11 Jan 2009. If we receive no reply from you by January 11, then we > will default your reply to "WebCGM WG response accepted." > > In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific > solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. > > If such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the > opportunity to raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by > the Director during the transition of this document to the next stage in > the W3C Recommendation Track. > > Best regards, > > On behalf of the WebCGM Working Group, > Thierry Michel, WebCGM WG Team Contact. > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Oct/0000.html > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-webcgm21-20080917/ > _____________________________________________________________ > * Comment Sent: 11 Nov 2008 10:28:28 +0000 > * Archived: > http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0811-webcgm/ > > The WebCGM WG has the following responses to your comment: > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > SUMMARY of your comment: > > Comment from the i18n review of: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-webcgm21-20080917/WebCGM21- > Config.html#ACI-fontmap > > Comment 4 > At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0811-webcgm/ > Editorial/substantive: S > Tracked by: RI > > Location in reviewed document: > 9.3.2.2 > [http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-webcgm21-20080917/WebCGM21- > Config.html#ACI-maplist] > > Comment: > > For cgmFont normalization, do you mean "stripping out all whitespace" or > normalizing white-space to a single space, as per substitutionList? > > RESPONSE to your comment: > > Resolution: > > The intent is indeed "stripping out all whitespace". This enables > identical normalization results, for example, for a font name that used > whitespace instead of camel case on the one hand, and on the other hand > a font name that used only camel case (with no whitespace), or one that > used hyphen or underscore in place of whitespace. These are legacy > situations that arise in WebCGM practice. Please see the response to > I18N WebCGM Comment #3 for more detail. > > > > --------------------------- end ------------------------------- > > >
Received on Wednesday, 7 January 2009 22:42:38 UTC