- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 12:31:40 -0500
- To: "Martin Duerst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, "Addison Phillips" <addison@yahoo-inc.com>
- Cc: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>, <public-i18n-core@w3.org>, <public-iri@w3.org>
I was just rereading the LEIRI section of http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-duerst-iri-bis-02.txt where it says: The syntax of Legacy Extended IRIs is the same as that for IRIs, except that ucschar is redefined.... In section "2.2. ABNF for IRI References and IRIs", it has a production for IRI (that has a required scheme) and another for IRI-reference. One could read section 7 to say that a LEIRI must match the production for IRI which would mean there could be no such thing as a relative LEIRI. I'm quite sure we don't want this. I think section 7 needs to say: The syntax of Legacy Extended IRIs is the same as that for IRI-reference, except that ucschar is redefined.... since the production for IRI-reference is: IRI-reference = IRI / irelative-ref making IRI-reference the most inclusive one. paul
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:32:07 UTC