RE: Feedback: qa-utf8-bom.en.php *1* [Comments]

Folks,

When I considered adding some text to address this comment, I found myself
wanting (once again) to edit the article in question
(http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-utf8-bom) to make it clearer.
I gave in to my urges and came up with this:

http://www.w3.org/International/questions/temp.php

I think this has a clearer structure.  Note that I also added links to a
couple of personal pages I wrote to provide suggested solutions.

Do you think we should go with this new version?

RI




============
Richard Ishida
Internationalization Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)
 
http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/
http://www.w3.org/International/
http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/
 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> Sent: 14 June 2007 08:32
> To: member-geo-feedback@w3.org
> Subject: Feedback: qa-utf8-bom.en.php *1* [Comments]
> 
> 
> http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-utf8-bom.en.php
> Usefulness: 1/5 
> Described as:   Designer   
> 
> Comments:
> It\'s been very educational the only thing is: it doesn\'t 
> answer the question \"how to remove this signature from the 
> file\". Some examples for Dreamweaver and other popular 
> editors will be helpful.  
> 

Received on Friday, 13 July 2007 15:32:21 UTC