Ian Hickson wrote: > On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Felix Sasaki wrote: >>>> Why is it not possible to formulate s.t. like "If selectors are used >>>> in a language which incooperates the namespace mechanisms, the >>>> following binding rules apply: ..."? >>> Because the rules might vary. >>> >>> If this does not satisfy you, please let us know. >> The i18n core working group is not satisfied with your reply. We see a >> problem with definition of conformance. Please define conformance with >> respect to the binding mechanism. This is different from prescribing it >> to all implementations. > > I'm not sure I understand. Could you expand on what you mean by > "conformance with respect to the binding mechanism"? > Please have a look at the proposal from David, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2006JanMar/0168.html . I would be satisfied with this. - Felix
Received on Wednesday, 15 March 2006 12:44:18 UTC