- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 23:16:37 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Cc: ishida@w3.org, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, www-style@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Felix Sasaki wrote: > > > > > > Why is it not possible to formulate s.t. like "If selectors are used > > > in a language which incooperates the namespace mechanisms, the > > > following binding rules apply: ..."? > > > > Because the rules might vary. > > > > If this does not satisfy you, please let us know. > > The i18n core working group is not satisfied with your reply. We see a > problem with definition of conformance. Please define conformance with > respect to the binding mechanism. This is different from prescribing it > to all implementations. I'm not sure I understand. Could you expand on what you mean by "conformance with respect to the binding mechanism"? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 13 March 2006 23:16:57 UTC