Re: I18n comment: syntax document

On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 wrote:
> Comment: Please add a link to the Syntax document, and make it a 
> dependency.

This is an official comment on behalf of the CSS working group.

I do not understand your request. As Bjoern wrote:

> > In #23, what do you mean by making the syntax module a 
> > dependency? It is perfectly reasonable to use CSS Selectors 
> > without other parts of the CSS syntax, e.g. as selection 
> > mechanism in an API, and the draft refers to the module only 
> > to point out that that module defines a namespace prefix 
> > binding mechanism.

On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Felix Sasaki wrote:
> see my reply to a mail from Daniel about the unclearness of dependency 
> of this draft on CSS.

We do not understand why it seems unclear.

I have made no change to the spec in response to this comment. In the 
likely event that this does not satisfy your request, please explain 
exactly what it is you would like to see, with your reasoning.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2006 20:02:38 UTC