- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 23:39:02 +0900
- To: www-style@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:54:07 +0900, <ishida@w3.org> wrote: > > Comment from the i18n review of: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-selectors-20051215/ > > Comment 23 > At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0601-css3-selectors/ > Editorial/substantive: E > Location in reviewed document: > Sec. 6.1.1 > [http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-selectors-20051215/#typenmsp] > > Comment: > Please add a link to the Syntax document, and make it a dependency. > > > >> From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:derhoermi@gmx.net] >> Sent: 20 January 2006 15:22 > >> In #23, what do you mean by making the syntax module a >> dependency? It is perfectly reasonable to use CSS Selectors >> without other parts of the CSS syntax, e.g. as selection >> mechanism in an API, and the draft refers to the module only >> to point out that that module defines a namespace prefix >> binding mechanism. > see my reply to a mail from Daniel about the unclearness of dependency of this draft on CSS.
Received on Monday, 23 January 2006 14:39:10 UTC